Authenticated Online Banking — Global Navigation

How might Truist’s navigation provide easy access to top tasks, everyday finances, and necessary support while promoting the features and services the clients need?

ROLE
Design & Strategy

CLIENT
Truist

DATE
2024

01

Discovery

Limitations

  • Too many items in the primary navigation have resulted in a “More” menu for overflow (essentially a “junk drawer”)

  • Numerous features have only one entry point from our dashboard; users have no way to access them from any other page

  • Users are going down wrong paths and having to back out

  • Poor hierarchy and naming conventions

  • Increasing number of requests to add new items to the navigation

Considerations

  • Review ways to better group navigation items

  • Offer entry points for Search and Truist Assist (AI assistant)

  • Review ways to better group navigation items

  • Explore a mega menu to surface more options and have a place for missing features

  • Make primary navigation consistent across all business segments (Retail, Business, and Wealth)

  • Keep scalability in mind

We combed through our architecture and put together a tree test to help refine some of the hierarchy and jumpstart our navigation groupings. Some of the flows are a bit of a loop back to the same landing pages so we wanted to make sure we weren’t duplicating entry points.

02

Research

Card Sort

  • 137 participants from Truist’s user research panel.

Tree Test

  • 112 participants from Truist’s user research panel.

Digital Banking Web Navigation Pattern Comparison

  • 379 Community participants

    • Mix of clients & non-clients that are primary web users

  • 10 tasks

    • Spanned all top-level nav items: Zelle, goals, card controls, security central, etc.

    • 7 random tasks per participant

Authenticated Navigation Hierarchy Refinements Tree Test

  • 470 Community participants with a mix of clients and non-clients

  • ~155 participants per concept

Competitive Analysis

  • Of the 16 largest banks studied, 15 use mega menu designs

We also surveyed users on a light vs dark color palette, a horizontal menu vs a vertical / left menu, and general UI feedback around hierarchy and visual groupings. Feedback generally favored very minimal designs with straightforward layouts and lighter color palettes.

03

Wireframing & Prototyping

Mega Menus Work

Our research and user testing proved that a mega menu would help us best organize our online banking navigation and allow for much better scalability for the future. It surfaces top tasks quicker and allows users to dive deeper into flows with fewer clicks. We’re also able to use the space to visually emphasize relationships across navigation items when there are several comparable choices to make or for the more complex flows like Financial Planning or Payroll for our Business users.

We were very focused on getting the groupings correct since a lot of the features have multiple flows respectively. For example, we knew that users wanted quicker access to their transfers and money movement features but that didn’t mean they needed an entry point for every option for each feature, only those that fell within the “Top Tasks” given by our business partners.

04

Design & Takeaways

The navigation wasn’t originally designed with scaling in mind, which resulted in a catch-all "more" menu dubbed the "junk drawer". With this redesign we were able to surface and highlight our user's top tasks (as outlined by user feedback as well as industry benchmark studies) as well as address and solve for scalability.

Outcomes To Date (June 2024)

  • Increase in average number of daily Personal Finance Management by 2.8x

  • Visits to spending analysis increased by 12.7%

  • Credit Score enrollment increased by 6.2%

    • Reduction in 3 navigation clicks, resulting in a 43% lift in credit score enrollments and 7% lift on biometrics usage on mobile

Next
Next

Truist — Authenticated Dashboard